Successful management of severe Kell alloimmunization in pregnancy with intravenous immune globulin.

Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN) is a condition that affects 1 to 2 out of 1000 patients during pregnancy (1). When an alloantibody is present, it is essential to identify its nature in order to organize appropriate follow-up. Kell-mediated HDFN is rare; it occurs in about 5% of Kell alloimmunized pregnant women. It is important to note that in case of anti-Kell immunization, the severity of HDFN is not correlated with maternal antibody titers, and anemia tends to occur earlier and more severely. Therefore, early diagnosing and management of this condition is crucial. In the management of severe fetal anemia due to Kell immunization, available treatments include in utero transfusion (IUT), immunoglobulin therapy. Other alternative treatments exist, such as plasmapheresis. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), a noninvasive therapeutic approach, acts through multiple mechanisms. IVIG has been evaluated in cases of RhD immunization with high maternal antibody titers and a history of pregnancies involving early hydrops or intrauterine death. Regarding the potential benefits of intravenous IgG therapy, it may delay the need for early IUT, reduce the overall reliance on IUT, and have a positive impact on obstetric outcomes. This case of IV IgG therapy of anti-Kell immunization offers a thought-provoking avenue for future exploration.

Application of anti-D immunoglobulin in D-negative pregnant women in China.

This article summarizes the current situation of anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D-Ig) use in RhD-negative pregnant women at home and abroad. The article describes the concept, research and development history, and domestic and foreign applications of anti-D-Ig and points out that anti-D-Ig has not been widely used in China, mainly due to reasons such as unavailability in the domestic market and non-standard current application strategies. The article focuses on analyzing the genetic and immunological characteristics of RhD-negative populations in China. The main manifestations were that the total number of hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) relatively high and D variant type. In particular, there are more Asian-type DEL, the importance of clinical application of anti-D-Ig was pointed out, and its antibody-mediated immunosuppressive mechanism was analyzed, which mainly includes red blood cell clearance, epitope blocking/steric hindrance, and Fc γ R Ⅱ B receptor mediated B cell inhibition, anti-D-Ig glycosylation, etc.; clarify the testing strategies of RhD blood group that should be adopted in response to the negative initial screening of pregnant and postpartum women; this article elaborates on the necessity of using anti-D-Ig in RhD-negative mothers after miscarriage or miscarriage, as well as the limitations of its application both domestically and internationally. It also proposes a solution strategy for detecting RhD blood group incompatibility HDFN as early as possible, diagnosing it in a timely manner, and using anti-D-Ig for its prevention and treatment. If the DEL gene is defined as an Asian-type DEL, anti-D-Ig prophylaxis in women would be unnecessary. Finally, based on the specificity of RhD-negative individuals, the article looks forward to the application trend of anti-D-Ig in China. It also called for related drugs to be listed in China as soon as possible and included in medical insurance.

Neonatal hemolytic disease: How should we use indirect and direct antiglobulin tests?

BACKGROUND: In newborns with hemolysis, the direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) play a key role in demonstrating the presence of an immune cause. We aimed to emphasize the importance of IAT in mothers of DAT-positive babies. METHODS: DAT was performed with forward blood grouping on cord blood in term babies who were born between September 2020 and September 2022. IAT was performed in the mothers of the babies who were found to have a positive DAT and antibody identification was performed in the mothers who were found to have a positive IAT. Specific antibodies detected and identified were associated with the clinical course. RESULTS: The study included 2769 babies and their mothers. The prevalence of DAT positivity was found to be 3.3% (87 of 2661). In DAT-positive babies, the rate of ABO incompatibility was 45.9%, the rate of RhD incompatibility was 5.7% and the rate of RhD and ABO incompatibility in association was 10.3%. The rate of subgroup incompatibility and other red blood cell antibodies was 18.3%. Phototherapy was applied because of indirect hyperbilirubinemia in 16.6% of the DAT-negative babies and in 51.5% of the DAT-positive babies. The need for phototherapy was significantly higher in DAT-positive infants (p < 0.01). Severe hemolytic disease of the newborn, bilirubin level, duration of phototherapy and use of intravenous immunoglobulin were found to be significantly higher in the babies whose mothers were IAT positive compared with the babies whose mothers were IAT negative (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IAT should be performed on all pregnant women. When screening with IAT is not performed during pregnancy, performing DAT in the baby plays a key role. We showed that the clinical course was more severe when mothers of DAT-positive babies were IAT positive.

A study on diagnostic performance of different immunohematological diagnostic tests in assessing the prevalence of ABO Hemolytic Disease of Newborn in the antenatal O group mothers and their neonatal outcome in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) results in the decreased lifespan of the red cells. HDN related to ABO incompatibility is mostly unnoticed because routine screening is not being done. This study was done to assess the prevalence of ABO-HDN and to compare different immunohematological tests. Methods-In this study 213 O group mothers and the 122 ABO-incompatible newborns born to them were included. Quantifying the maternal IgG anti-A/anti-B antibody titer was done by Conventional Tube Technique (CTT) using Dithiothreitol (DTT) pretreated maternal serum. Hemolysin test was performed on the mothers having titer > 256. These cases were followed up and, after delivery, were monitored for ABO HDN, along with direct antiglobulin testing and elution studies. The prevalence of ABO-HDN was calculated, and the different diagnostic parameters of the tests were calculated. Results- The prevalence of ABO-HDN in our population was estimated to be 1.7%, 6.1% & 10.6% in our population, O group mothers, and O group mothers with ABOincompatible newborns, respectively. Maternal titer≥ 512 strongly correlated with ABOHDN. DAT positivity is a good predictor of ABO-HDN, especially using sensitive techniques. Maternal IgG titers have the highest sensitivity & Negative Predictive Value, while DAT has the highest specificity & Positive Predictive Value. Conclusion - Maternal ABO antibody titration may be advocated in the centers to identify high-risk groups. It can advocate institutional delivery and dedicated follow-up of newborns with ABO-HDN. Blood grouping & DAT may be performed in all newborns born to O blood group to identify high-risk cases.

Immunohematological testing and transfusion management of the prenatal patient.

The primary indication for immunohematological testing in the prenatal patient is to detect and identify maternal red cell antibodies. If there are antibodies that are expected to hemolyze the fetus' red cells, their strength of reactivity must be tested, and the fetus' antigen status determined. After delivery, testing is performed to assess the extent of fetomaternal hemorrhage, as a large hemorrhage may require other therapeutic interventions. Another major role for immunohematological testing is to select blood components appropriately when intrauterine transfusion is required for fetal anemia resulting from maternal alloimmunization or some other cause. Supplementation with molecular methods has transformed the practice of immunohematology, particularly as it applies to typing for the D antigen of the Rh blood group system. Notwithstanding the advances in testing, close coordination and communication between the transfusion service and the obstetrics service are the foundation for ensuring the finest care for prenatal patients, and for new mothers and their infants. This review describes testing and transfusion practices for prenatal patients, using case presentations to highlight the management of selected immunohematological findings. It also includes a discussion of key patient management topics that are currently unresolved.

Comparison of automated solid phase versus manual saline indirect antiglobulin test methodology for non-ABO antibody titration: Implications for perinatal antibody monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Accurate antibody titration is crucial in prenatal evaluations to identify patients who need clinical monitoring for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) causing fetal anemia. This study compares the established gold standard method of manual tube saline indirect antiglobulin testing (SIAT) with the newer automated solid phase (ASP) method of antibody titration and aims to establish the critical titer threshold for ASP that corresponds to the previously established SIAT critical threshold of ≥16 used in our laboratory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven prenatal and donor plasma samples with known antibodies were tested using both SIAT and ASP methodologies and results were compared. RESULTS: The study found that ASP titers were, on average, 1.33 dilutions higher than SIAT titers. The critical titer cutoff for ASP was determined to be ≥32, which is one tube higher than the SIAT cutoff of ≥16. DISCUSSION: The ASP method for antibody titration offers greater reproducibility and efficiency compared with manual SIAT titration. This study suggests that a titer cutoff of ≥32 is appropriate for most clinically significant antibodies using ASP. However, further research is needed to determine the comparability of ASP with SIAT in samples with multiple antibodies, anti-M antibodies, and other less common antibodies. Validation of the ASP titer cutoff against HDFN clinical outcomes is required before implementing this test for routine use in perinatal antibody titration.

Significance of immunohematologic testing in mother and newborn ABO incompatibility.

The aim of this study was to define risk factors for jaundice and anemia in newborns with a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and/or with an incompatible crossmatch due to ABO incompatibility between mother and newborn. ABO incompatibility has become a more significant cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn since the introduction of effective anti-D prophylaxis. The condition is common and, if clinically significant at all, causes only mild jaundice, which can be treated with phototherapy (PT). However, rare and serious presentations, requiring transfusion therapy, have been noted. Clinical, laboratory, and immunohematologic data were collected retrospectively from medical records of ABO-incompatible newborns and their mothers over a 5-year period (2016-2020) from University Hospital Centre Zagreb. Two groups of newborns were compared: those who needed medical intervention because of hyperbilirubinemia or anemia and those who did not. Within the group of newborns requiring intervention, we also compared those with A and B blood groups. Over the 5-year period, 72 of 184 (39%) newborns required treatment. The treatment was PT in 71 (38%) newborns and erythrocyte transfusion in 2 (1%). In 112 (61%) newborns, ABO incompatibility was an accidental finding while performing blood group typing; these newborns did not require any therapy. In conclusion, we found a statistical, but not clinically significant, difference between the groups of treated and untreated newborns, related to the mode of delivery and DAT positivity within hours of delivery. There were no statistically significant differences in characteristics between the groups of treated newborns, except for two newborns with blood group A who received erythrocyte transfusions.

Clinical value of combination detection of direct antiglobulin test and serum albumin globulin ratio in severe hyperbilirubinemia caused by ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn.

Background To explore of a combination of antiglobulin test(DAT) and albumin globulin ratio(AGR) could predict the severity of ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn(ABO-HDN).Methods The measurement of DAT, AGR and combination detection of DAT and AGR was done to predict severe ABO-HDN hyperbilirubinemia in 270 full-term infants based on whether the infants received transfusions of blood components. The infants were divided into three groups according to the results of DAT and ARG and compared the differences of phototherapy day and hospitalization day of the three groups.Results Of the 270 cases enrolled in this study, 69 infants were DAT positive. Peak total bilirubin, AGR, and positive DAT were independently associated with the need for blood components transfusion. ROC curve analysis for blood components transfusion showed that DAT cutoff value >± with a sensitivity of 39.4% and a specificity of 83.9%, AGR cutoff value <2.05 with a sensitivity of 54.1% and a specificity of 85.7%, and combination detection of DAT and ARG with a sensitivity of 62.1% and a specificity of 91.2%. The AUCs for DAT, AGR, and combination detection of DAT and AGR were .621, .740, and .750 respectively. The phototherapy day and hospitalization day were significantly longer in group of AGR <2.05 and DAT >± than that of a group of AGR <2.05 and group of DAT >±.Conclusions DAT and ARG could be early predictors for the severity ABO-HDN hyperbilirubinemia and combination detection of DAT and AGR could further increase its predictive value.

Genotipificación del gen RHD en ADN fetal libre en plasma de embarazadas RhD negativo / Genotyping of the RHD gene in free fetal DNA in plasma of RhD negative pregnant women

Objetivo: Determinar el grupo RhD fetal a través del estudio del gen RHD en ADN fetal que se encuentra libre en plasma de embarazadas RhD negativo. Método: Se analizó la presencia de los genes RHD, SRY y BGLO en ADNfl obtenido de plasma de 51 embarazadas RhD negativo no sensibilizadas, utilizando una qPCR. Los resultados del estudio genético del gen RHD se compararon con el estudio del grupo sanguíneo RhD realizado por método serológico en muestras de sangre de cordón, y los resultados del estudio del gen SRY fueron cotejados con el sexo fetal determinado por ecografía. Se calcularon la sensibilidad, la especificidad, los valores predictivos y la capacidad discriminativa del método estandarizado. Resultados: El gen RHD estaba presente en el 72,5% de las muestras y el gen SRY en el 55,5%, coincidiendo en un 100% con los resultados del grupo RhD detectado en sangre de cordón y con el sexo fetal confirmado por ecografía, respectivamente. Conclusiones: Fue posible deducir el grupo sanguíneo RhD del feto mediante el estudio del ADN fetal que se encuentra libre en el plasma de embarazadas con un método molecular no invasivo desarrollado y validado para este fin. Este test no invasivo puede ser utilizado para tomar la decisión de administrar inmunoglobulina anti-D solo a embarazadas RhD negativo que portan un feto RhD positivo.

Objective: To determine the fetal RhD group through the study of the RHD gene in fetal DNA found free in plasma of RhD negative pregnant women. Method: The presence of the RHD, SRY and BGLO genes in fetal DNA obtained from plasma of 51 non-sensitized RhD negative pregnant women was analyzed using qPCR. The results of the genetic study of the RHD gene were compared with the RhD blood group study performed by serological method in cord blood samples, and the results of the SRY gene study were compared with the fetal sex determined by ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and discriminative capacity of the standardized method were calculated. Results: The RHD gene was present in 72.5% of the samples and the SRY gene in 55.5%, coinciding 100% with the results of the RhD group detected in cord blood, and with the fetal sex confirmed by ultrasound, respectively. Conclusions: It was possible to deduce the RhD blood group of the fetus through the study of fetal DNA found free in the plasma of pregnant women with a non-invasive molecular method developed and validated for this purpose. This non-invasive test can be used to make the decision to administer anti-D immunoglobulin only to RhD-negative pregnant women carrying an RhD-positive fetus.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn mediated by anti-Dia in a U.S. hospital.

Dia is one of the most clinically significant low-prevalence antigens in the Diego blood group system, since antibodies to Dia have, albeit rarely, been implicated in hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Given the geographical association, most anti-Dia HDFN cases have been reported in Japan, China, and Poland. We describe a case of HDFN in a neonate born to a 36-year-old G4P2012 woman of self-identified Hispanic ethnicity and of South American descent with multiple negative antibody detection tests in a U.S. hospital. Upon delivery, a cord blood direct antiglobulin test was positive (3+ reactivity), and neonatal bilirubin levels were moderately elevated, but phototherapy and transfusion were not required. This case highlights a rare, unexpected cause of HDFN in the United States secondary to anti-Dia, given the near-universal absence of this antigen and antibody in most U.S. patient populations. The case also demonstrates the need for awareness of antibodies to antigens that are considered "low-prevalence" in most populations but that might be encountered more frequently in specific racial or ethnic groups and may require more extensive testing.

A Rare Case of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Caused by Anti-s Antibody in a Chinese Patient.

BACKGROUND: Anti-s is a rare alloantibody, and the reported cases of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) caused by anti-s are limited to non-Asian populations. METHODS: Here, we report the case of a Chinese woman with a history of multiple pregnancies who developed an alloantibody with anti-s specificity. RESULTS: Her newborn developed HDFN caused by anti-s but the clinical symptoms were not serious. After supportive treatment and bilirubin light phototherapy, the baby was discharged with a good prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of anti-s-induced HDFN in a Chinese patient, highlighting the need for further research in the Asian population.

Maternal Cold-Reacting Immunoglobulin G Anti-M of MNS Blood Group System Causing Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus.

Several cases of the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-M antibodies have been reported, in which almost all the HDFN-associated anti-M were warmly reacting. Here we report two cases of severe HDFN associated with cold-reacting IgG anti-M. In both cases, pregnancy was terminated, in weeks 33 and 23 respectively, due to a diagnosis of fetal growth retardation (FGR). To our knowledge, these are the most severe HDFN cases caused by cold-reacting IgG anti-M.

Serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity in antenatal testing and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity (SRUS) in pregnancy is not clear based on available literature. The aim of this study is to determine if SRUS is associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from eight institutions over an 11-year study period (2010-2020), when available (5/8 sites). The outcome of the pregnancies with SRUS-no, mild, moderate, or severe HDFN-was determined. RESULTS: SRUS was demonstrated in 589 pregnancies. After excluding those with incomplete data, a total of 284 pregnancies were included in the primary HDFN outcome analysis. SRUS was detected in 124 (44%) pregnancies in isolation, and none were affected by HDFN. Of 41 pregnancies with SRUS and ABO incompatibility, 37 (90%) were unaffected, and 4 (10%) were associated with mild HDFN. Of 98 pregnancies with SRUS and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), 80 (81%) were unaffected, and 19 (19%) were associated with mild to severe HDFN. There was 1 case of mild HDFN and 1 case of severe HDFN in the 21 pregnancies with SRUS, ABO incompatibility, and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), and 19 (90%) were unaffected by HDFN. Among all patients with repeat testing, newly identified alloantibodies or other antibodies were identified in 63 of 212 (30%) patients. Although most were not clinically significant, on occasion SRUS preceded clinically significant antibody(s) associated with HDFN (3%, 5/188). CONCLUSION: The antenatal serologic finding of SRUS in isolation is not associated with HDFN but may precede clinically significant antibodies.

ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn: a need for clarity and consistency in diagnosis.

The diagnosis of ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn (ABO HDN) has been the subject of considerable debate and clinical confusion. Its use as an overarching default diagnosis for hyperbilirubinemia in all ABO incompatible neonates regardless of serological findings is problematic and lacks diagnostic precision. Data on hemolysis indexed by carbon monoxide (CO) levels in expired air (ETCOc) and blood (COHbc) support an essential role for a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) in making a more precise diagnosis of ABO HDN. A working definition that includes ABO incompatibility, significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and a positive DAT is needed to gain clarity and consistency in the diagnosis of ABO HDN. Absent a positive DAT, the diagnosis of ABO HDN is suspect. Instead, a negative DAT in a severely hyperbilirubinemic ABO incompatible neonate should trigger an exhaustive search for an alternative cause, a search that may require the use of targeted gene panels.

History and current standard of postnatal management in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Since the discovery of the Rh blood group system in 1940, a greater understanding of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) was gained. In the years thereafter, researchers and clinicians came to the current understanding that fetal and neonatal red blood cells (RBC) are hemolyzed by maternal alloantibodies directed against RBC antigens potentially leading to severe disease. Preventative measures, such as Rhesus(D) immunoprophylaxis (RhIG), have greatly decreased the prevalence of Rh(D)-mediated HDFN, although a gap between high-income countries and middle- to low-income countries was created largely due to a lack in availability and high costs of RhIG. Other important developments in the past decades have improved the identification, monitoring, and care of pregnancies, fetuses, and neonates with HDFN. Prenatally, fetal anemia may occur and intrauterine transfusions may be needed. Postnatally, pediatricians should be aware of the (antenatally determined) risk of hemolysis in RBC alloimmunization and should provide treatment for hyperbilirubinemia in the early phase and monitor for anemia in the late phase of the disease. Through this review, we aim to provide an overview of important historic events and to provide hands-on guidelines for the delivery and postnatal management of neonates with HDFN. Secondarily, we aim to describe recent scientific findings and evidence gaps. CONCLUSION:  Multiple developments have improved the identification, monitoring, and care of pregnancies and neonates with HDFN throughout the centuries. Pediatricians should be aware of the (antenatally determined) risk of hemolysis in RBC alloimmunization and should provide treatment for hyperbilirubinemia in the early phase and monitor for late anemia in the late phase of the disease. Future studies should be set in an international setting and ultimately aim to eradicate HDFN on a global scale. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Developments have led to a greater understanding of the pathophysiology, an improved serological identification and monitoring of at-risk cases and the current pre- and postnatal treatment. WHAT IS NEW: • This review provides the pediatrician with hands-on guidelines for the delivery and postnatal management of neonates with HDFN. • Future studies should be set in an international setting with the ultimate aim of eradicating HDFN.

Identification and management of fetal anemia due to hemolytic disease.

INTRODUCTION: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a condition caused by maternal alloantibodies against fetal red blood cells (RBCs) that can cause severe morbidity and mortality in the fetus and newborn. Adequate screening programs allow for timely prevention and intervention resulting in significant reduction of the disease over the last decades. Nevertheless, HDFN still occurs and with current treatment having reached an optimum, focus shifts toward noninvasive therapy options. AREAS COVERED: This review focusses on the timely identification of high risk cases and antenatal management. Furthermore, we elaborate on future perspectives including improvement of screening, identification of high risk cases and promising treatment options. EXPERT OPINION: In high-income countries mortality and morbidity rates due to HDFN have drastically been reduced over the last decades, yet worldwide anti-D mediated HDFN still accounts for 160,000 perinatal deaths and 100,000 patients with disabilities every year. Much of these deaths and disabilities could have been avoided with proper identification and prophylaxis. By implementing sustainable prevention, screening, and disease treatment measures in all countries this will systemically reduce unnecessary perinatal deaths. There is a common responsibility to engage in this cause.

Routine noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal Rh D in maternal plasma-A 2-year experience from a single center in Belgium.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to rhesus D (RhD) immunization is a potentially life-threatening situation for which use of Rh Immunoglobulin (RhIg) has decreased risk drastically. Determination of fetal RHD on maternal plasma can be used to restrict prenatal RhIg administration to women carrying an RhD-positive child, avoiding unnecessary administration of blood-derived products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study is to determine the performance of fetal RHD typing in our center. We prospectively collected 205 fetal RHD and 127 serological cord blood RhD data from RhD-negative women starting at 11 weeks of pregnancy (from October 2019 to October 2021). Real-time polymerase chain reaction targeting RHD exon 5 and 7 was used, similar to the screening program in The Netherlands, supplemented with an amplification control (beta-actin; ACTB) and a sex determination marker located on the Y-chromosome (SRY gene). RESULTS: Fetal RHD testing reached a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. No false-negative nor false-positive results were reported. Inconclusive results (6%, 13/205) were due to weak amplification in 10 cases, a maternal RHD variant in 2 cases (RHD*01N.71 and partial DVI), and a fetal RHD variant (partial DVI) in 1 case. Unnecessary administration of RhIg prophylaxis was avoided in 33% of cases and on the other hand was administered in one case (fetal partial DVI) which would have been missed with cord blood serology. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the high accuracy of routine prenatal fetal RHD gene screening after 11 weeks of pregnancy, encouraging routine clinical practice.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the sensitizing pregnancy where anti-D was incorrectly identified as RhIG.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a potentially fatal complication in Rh-incompatible pregnancies and rarely occurs in the sensitizing pregnancy. Distinguishing RhIG from true anti-D identified is challenging. A case of severe HDFN in which a sample drawn at 28 weeks showed anti-D antibody (3+ strength) attributed to RhIG is described. RBC antibody testing early in pregnancy was negative. At birth, the infant was severely anemic and maternal anti-D titer was 1:256. This case represents a clinically significant anti-D in the sensitizing pregnancy that was missed due to confusion with RhIG. METHODS: To determine if agglutination strength could be helpful, a retrospective chart-review using both electronic and paper medical records was performed on 348 samples identified as RhIG and 52 true anti-D samples. The agglutination strength of antibody was recorded for each sample. RESULTS: For RhIG, there was an even distribution between the weak to moderate agglutination strength (w+, 1+, and 2+) results (35%, 26%, and 33%, respectively) and just 6% had a 3+ strength. Agglutination strength in patients with high titer (≥1:16) anti-D showed they often (44.4%) have 1+ or 2+ agglutination reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that agglutination strength alone does not provide reliable evidence to distinguish RhIG from high titer anti-D antibodies. We recommend that in cases where there is any uncertainty about whether the anti-D reactivity is due to RhIG, titers should be performed to rule out clinically significant anti-D antibody.

The role of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal blood group typing in Australia.

Maternal alloimmunisation against red blood cell antigens can cause haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Although most frequently caused by anti-D, since the implementation of rhesus D (RhD) immunoglobulin prophylaxis, other alloantibodies have become more prevalent in HDFN. Recent advances in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) have allowed early prediction of HDFN risk in alloimmunised pregnancies and allow clinicians to focus health resources on those pregnancies that require intervention. This article aims to provide updates on the current status of NIPT in Australia as both a diagnostic and screening tool in pregnancy.

Hydrops fetalis with isolated massive ascites in a preterm neonate with rhesus disease.

Significant progress in prenatal care has decreased the incidence of rhesus incompatibility, which may result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). This case report describes an unusual presentation of HDFN in a preterm infant delivered by caesarean section with isolated massive abdominal fluid collection as the leading clinical sign in addition to severe anemia. The immediate drainage of ascites provided transient clinical stabilization with improved pulmonary function in the delivery suite. After admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), HDFN treatment was initiated. This case report shows the importance of adequately trained staff including neonatologists, pediatricians and NICU nurses in the delivery suite to provide neonatal intensive care for HDFN.